Comments on: Am I talking to myself? TweetReach may have the answer http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer This is the Blog of Adam Parker on numbers and relevance Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:09:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42 By: Social spirit | Wadds' PR Blog http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-435 Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:04:24 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-435 […] to say a quick thank you to all the folk that have linked to my blog in recent months including: Adam Parker, Andy West, David Phillips, Ged Caroll, Headshift, James Cridland, Mark Pinsent, Michael Litman, […]

]]> By: AdamParker http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-417 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:39:23 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-417 Hi Hayes

Thanks for stopping by. Take your point about running weekly reports and realise that the limit isn’t your doing, but this does mean that for each search a user wants to analyse they are looking at $80 a month (if I have my sums right) and I suspect that level of cost per term might be out of the reach of many. Perhaps you could offer some sort of deal whereby users paid the $20 fee once and paid a lower rate for future queries on the *same* term/url/hashtag?

Nice tool though, despite the API limitation, and the deduplication of followers must take a bit processing? :-)

Good luck with it.
Adam

]]> By: Hayes Davis http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-416 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:39:57 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-416 Adam,

I’m the founder of Appozite – the company responsible for TweetReach. I appreciate the in-depth post. Just wanted to drop you a quick comment to let you know that the reach number is indeed a *unique* number measured by counting each follower of each twitterer that sends a tweet only once.

As for the 1500 tweet/7 day limit, that’s a frustration for us as well. For customers that want to measure results over a longer period, we tell them to run a report a week. It’s not optimal but it allows us to get around those Twitter-imposed limits.

Feel free to drop me a line (@hayesdavis) if you have any questions or additional comments.

Hayes

]]> By: AdamParker http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-414 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:52:52 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-414 Agreed it might well be useful for ongoing monitoring, however the 50 tweet limit without payment is a bit of an issue even for that purpose. Even my little old blog has had a couple of posts tweeted a lot more than 50 times nevermind those of the great and the good such as yourself :-) But yes it could certainly provide an ad hoc indication of impact.

Oh and by the way this isn’t your first comment http://www.showmenumbers.com/general/one-downbut-3w-to-go#comment-118 Oh how quick they forget me… :-)

]]> By: Realwire analysis of TweetReach | Wadds' PR Blog http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-413 Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:54:17 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-413 […] CEO Adam Parker (@adparker) has given TweetReach a thorough going over. In a post on his blog he’s spotted that the tool crucially de-duplicates shared connections in a network to measure […]

]]> By: Stephen Davies http://www.showmenumbers.com/measurement/am-i-talking-to-myself-tweetreach-may-have-the-answer/comment-page-1#comment-412 Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:31:54 +0000 http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=915#comment-412 I think it might come in useful if you’re doing ongoing monitoring though. I.e. if you can measure the reach as you go.

Long time reader, first time commenter. Thanks for updating the blogroll. :)

]]>