<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati new rankings explained (I hope!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/technorati-new-rankings-explained-i-hope/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/technorati-new-rankings-explained-i-hope</link>
	<description>This is the Blog of Adam Parker on numbers and relevance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/technorati-new-rankings-explained-i-hope/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=926#comment-470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Round Table dudes no longer have faith in Technorati because it now calculates influence more accurately and places less value on outdated and easily manipulable techniques? Go figure. Here&#039;s to the spirit of the age!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Round Table dudes no longer have faith in Technorati because it now calculates influence more accurately and places less value on outdated and easily manipulable techniques? Go figure. Here&#8217;s to the spirit of the age!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
