<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why all the fuss about Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter</link>
	<description>This is the Blog of Adam Parker on numbers and relevance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamParker</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdamParker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments David and definitely don&#039;t worry about the length I would never edit what someone said and appreciate you taking the time. In fact anyone who knows me would tell you that I have the ability to go on and on and on.... so I certainly couldn&#039;t criticise anyone else for lengthy comments :-)

I agree with all your points about community, dipping in and out and collaboration. I suppose I was just looking to focus on the structural things about Twitter that enables these things but wholeheartedly agree that it is how real people than embrace and use these tools that is what it is ulimately all about. I need to spend longer getting to grips with Wave and when I have a spare hour and 20 will watch the vid on your blog.

Cheers Adam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments David and definitely don&#8217;t worry about the length I would never edit what someone said and appreciate you taking the time. In fact anyone who knows me would tell you that I have the ability to go on and on and on&#8230;. so I certainly couldn&#8217;t criticise anyone else for lengthy comments <img src="http://www.showmenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>I agree with all your points about community, dipping in and out and collaboration. I suppose I was just looking to focus on the structural things about Twitter that enables these things but wholeheartedly agree that it is how real people than embrace and use these tools that is what it is ulimately all about. I need to spend longer getting to grips with Wave and when I have a spare hour and 20 will watch the vid on your blog.</p>
<p>Cheers Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david coxon</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david coxon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting how the internet changes everything and just when you thing you have got a grip on communicating with things like twitter the next technology comes along. On thursday/friday at the google io 09 developer conferenece google showed us something that may just change the way we think about communications in the future. Here&#039;s a link to a blog post about Google Wave and why it might just wave goodbye to twitter http://worldofitblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/could-google-wave-goodbye-to-twitter/ 
.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the internet changes everything and just when you thing you have got a grip on communicating with things like twitter the next technology comes along. On thursday/friday at the google io 09 developer conferenece google showed us something that may just change the way we think about communications in the future. Here&#8217;s a link to a blog post about Google Wave and why it might just wave goodbye to twitter <a href="http://worldofitblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/could-google-wave-goodbye-to-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://worldofitblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/could-google-wave-goodbye-to-twitter/</a><br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what I love about Twitter and the blogosphere: a massive stream of conversations that continue to develop, and more people can join in, bringing new knowledge and ideas to the table. So when people ask &#039;why all the fuss about Twitter?&#039; they&#039;re really asking &#039;why all the fuss about communities and conversation?&#039;.

Like Dave says, it&#039;s not about the platform, it&#039;s about the medium. We&#039;re communicating in a brilliant new way that&#039;s both in real-time and archived, and anyone can join in, whether to contribute or just observe. I bloody love it :&gt;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I love about Twitter and the blogosphere: a massive stream of conversations that continue to develop, and more people can join in, bringing new knowledge and ideas to the table. So when people ask &#8216;why all the fuss about Twitter?&#8217; they&#8217;re really asking &#8216;why all the fuss about communities and conversation?&#8217;.</p>
<p>Like Dave says, it&#8217;s not about the platform, it&#8217;s about the medium. We&#8217;re communicating in a brilliant new way that&#8217;s both in real-time and archived, and anyone can join in, whether to contribute or just observe. I bloody love it :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david coxon</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david coxon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great post and you both make excellent points. Twitter is indeed fast (by which you mean real-time i guess), permission based, relevant (sometimes) and finally reliable (of late anyway). . 

But i think its popularity is far more basic than this, its to do with community and society. Of course people use social networks for different reasons, some simply want to hang with the cool kids, others like the attention, or it could be the peer praise, the status of having more followers that your friends or you may you genuinely just like to help people out.

But twitter is different to most social networks, for a start with most social networks you know most of your friends in the real world before letting them into your network, with twitter the opposite applies most users didn&#039;t know the followers before finding them on twitter. Because of the way twitter works you can quickly find, like minded people regardless to who there age, background, location and participate in conversations with them. 

You very quickly become connected to many different circles of friends of link those communities forming super communities, which means that information travels very quickly, in ways that have never been seen before, you get the news before it can even be reported on tv.

Once you&#039;ve been going a while, your likely to have followers from around the world not just where you live,this means that whenever you go on line your likely to be able to talk to someone online - it may be 4 in the morning where you are its 2pm somewhere in the world.

Also on the time issue, because twitter conversations are open collaborative conversations, they are collaborative and participatory, so you often find yourself being drawn into them. 

In someways twitter is a bit like the coffee bar in friends or your local bar, you can just pop any time of the day or night have a quick chat and to catch up with friends and if you need a bit of advice there&#039;s sure to be someone there that can help you out.

Then there is the structure, it incredibly open, and people often post very personal experiences, again this makes bonds with those people incredibly strong.

Then there is the technical stuff, it is open, so people are free to create fun ways to manipulate the data like the snow maps, or the emotion steams, it is also structure (all be it informally people using hash tags) this means its easy to manipulate and can be incorporated into searches, blog, discussions etc.

As an application Twitter is yet to make money, and it may well be replaced by something else, possibly something based on the new google wave technology, but as a concept this sort of lite open social network is probably going to grow from strength to strength.

Sorry this ended up being a very long comment and not a very structured one at that, but its sort of the nature of titter, it babbles on and on in the background going this way and that an occasionally you find a truely  serendipitous conversation. (Adam feel free to edit it down before posting)

Ps. Thanks for the name drop Dan, and Adam for linking to my new(ish)blog . Hope to continue the conversation over a beer some time soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post and you both make excellent points. Twitter is indeed fast (by which you mean real-time i guess), permission based, relevant (sometimes) and finally reliable (of late anyway). . </p>
<p>But i think its popularity is far more basic than this, its to do with community and society. Of course people use social networks for different reasons, some simply want to hang with the cool kids, others like the attention, or it could be the peer praise, the status of having more followers that your friends or you may you genuinely just like to help people out.</p>
<p>But twitter is different to most social networks, for a start with most social networks you know most of your friends in the real world before letting them into your network, with twitter the opposite applies most users didn&#8217;t know the followers before finding them on twitter. Because of the way twitter works you can quickly find, like minded people regardless to who there age, background, location and participate in conversations with them. </p>
<p>You very quickly become connected to many different circles of friends of link those communities forming super communities, which means that information travels very quickly, in ways that have never been seen before, you get the news before it can even be reported on tv.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve been going a while, your likely to have followers from around the world not just where you live,this means that whenever you go on line your likely to be able to talk to someone online &#8211; it may be 4 in the morning where you are its 2pm somewhere in the world.</p>
<p>Also on the time issue, because twitter conversations are open collaborative conversations, they are collaborative and participatory, so you often find yourself being drawn into them. </p>
<p>In someways twitter is a bit like the coffee bar in friends or your local bar, you can just pop any time of the day or night have a quick chat and to catch up with friends and if you need a bit of advice there&#8217;s sure to be someone there that can help you out.</p>
<p>Then there is the structure, it incredibly open, and people often post very personal experiences, again this makes bonds with those people incredibly strong.</p>
<p>Then there is the technical stuff, it is open, so people are free to create fun ways to manipulate the data like the snow maps, or the emotion steams, it is also structure (all be it informally people using hash tags) this means its easy to manipulate and can be incorporated into searches, blog, discussions etc.</p>
<p>As an application Twitter is yet to make money, and it may well be replaced by something else, possibly something based on the new google wave technology, but as a concept this sort of lite open social network is probably going to grow from strength to strength.</p>
<p>Sorry this ended up being a very long comment and not a very structured one at that, but its sort of the nature of titter, it babbles on and on in the background going this way and that an occasionally you find a truely  serendipitous conversation. (Adam feel free to edit it down before posting)</p>
<p>Ps. Thanks for the name drop Dan, and Adam for linking to my new(ish)blog . Hope to continue the conversation over a beer some time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does Twitter make money for themselves to keep this great social media activity a viable business?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Twitter make money for themselves to keep this great social media activity a viable business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point. I think it depends on how you look at it. The idealist in my says that having to put the groundwork in and develop a follower base organically is a good thing â€“ emphasising the importance of relationships and all that â€“ but like you say, it&#039;s an unrealistic expectation in the fast-paced world.

I was out running with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidcoxon.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave Coxon&lt;/a&gt; yesterday and he was telling me all about the latest craic in search. I just asked stupid questions and wished I knew what he was talking about... Sounds like some big changes are coming though! Thanks for the Foremski link, I&#039;ll keep an eye out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I think it depends on how you look at it. The idealist in my says that having to put the groundwork in and develop a follower base organically is a good thing â€“ emphasising the importance of relationships and all that â€“ but like you say, it&#8217;s an unrealistic expectation in the fast-paced world.</p>
<p>I was out running with <a href="http://www.davidcoxon.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">Dave Coxon</a> yesterday and he was telling me all about the latest craic in search. I just asked stupid questions and wished I knew what he was talking about&#8230; Sounds like some big changes are coming though! Thanks for the Foremski link, I&#8217;ll keep an eye out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamParker</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdamParker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment Dan. Where getting answers is concerned is the cost with Twitter a virtue? I think it is one of its downsides. I think your point about reliability is valid if you have invested the time in building up a relevant and responsive follower base. However investing time is not something that most people generally want to do in the fast paced world we now live in. If there is a quick and easy way of getting the answer they need i.e. Google I think most people are more inclined to go this route. With Google starting to add tools like Search Options so people can filter their results as well I suspect their hegemony is pretty safe. Still its early days. Tom Foremski is apparently about to post http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2009/05/does_anyone_hav.php about the next big thing this week so perhaps we will be talking about something else in a few days!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Dan. Where getting answers is concerned is the cost with Twitter a virtue? I think it is one of its downsides. I think your point about reliability is valid if you have invested the time in building up a relevant and responsive follower base. However investing time is not something that most people generally want to do in the fast paced world we now live in. If there is a quick and easy way of getting the answer they need i.e. Google I think most people are more inclined to go this route. With Google starting to add tools like Search Options so people can filter their results as well I suspect their hegemony is pretty safe. Still its early days. Tom Foremski is apparently about to post <a href="http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2009/05/does_anyone_hav.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2009/05/does_anyone_hav.php</a> about the next big thing this week so perhaps we will be talking about something else in a few days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/online-pr/why-all-the-fuss-about-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=601#comment-246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three excellent points. How about adding &#039;reliability&#039; in there too? 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://gloryinvirtue.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/twitters-human-touch-and-how-this-helps-searchability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I blogged a while back&lt;/a&gt; about crowdsourcing info on Twitter, and how it&#039;s much more reliable than search engines when looking for recommendations on products or services. It helps us connect directly to each other, and cut out the influence of the middle man. I think you blogged a few weeks ago on how Google is a heavily-biased algorithm and not people, and this is going to be an important distinction in the future of search. 

I suppose we&#039;ve already had this through Technorati and other blog search engines in the past, but I think Twitter has a much more powerful search capability â€“ probably due to the speed, permission and relevance factors â€“ and it&#039;s going to get better.

But all this comes at a cost â€“ which is the time and effort it takes to build a network organically, and develop relationships with your followers. There aren&#039;t really any shortcuts to this, and I think this is one of Twitter&#039;s greatest virtues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three excellent points. How about adding &#8216;reliability&#8217; in there too? </p>
<p><a href="http://gloryinvirtue.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/twitters-human-touch-and-how-this-helps-searchability/" rel="nofollow">I blogged a while back</a> about crowdsourcing info on Twitter, and how it&#8217;s much more reliable than search engines when looking for recommendations on products or services. It helps us connect directly to each other, and cut out the influence of the middle man. I think you blogged a few weeks ago on how Google is a heavily-biased algorithm and not people, and this is going to be an important distinction in the future of search. </p>
<p>I suppose we&#8217;ve already had this through Technorati and other blog search engines in the past, but I think Twitter has a much more powerful search capability â€“ probably due to the speed, permission and relevance factors â€“ and it&#8217;s going to get better.</p>
<p>But all this comes at a cost â€“ which is the time and effort it takes to build a network organically, and develop relationships with your followers. There aren&#8217;t really any shortcuts to this, and I think this is one of Twitter&#8217;s greatest virtues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
