<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Show me numbers &#187; banking crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmenumbers.com/tag/banking-crisis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com</link>
	<description>This is the Blog of Adam Parker, Chief Executive of RealWire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>£37bn, but the words aren&#8217;t worth the paper they are written on</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/37bn-but-the-words-arent-worth-the-paper-they-are-written-on</link>
		<comments>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/37bn-but-the-words-arent-worth-the-paper-they-are-written-on#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdamParker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordon brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taper relief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s announcement of £37bn of investment in British banks was accompanied by words from Gordon Brown at his press conference about rewarding “hard work, effort and enterprise” rather than “irresponsibility and risk taking”.
This is a sentiment I agree with wholeheartedly but one I find very strange coming from the government who only a year ago [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s <a title="UK banks £37bn bailout unveiled" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7666570.stm" target="_self">announcement</a> of £37bn of investment in British banks was accompanied by words from Gordon Brown at his press conference about rewarding “hard work, effort and enterprise” rather than “irresponsibility and risk taking”.</p>
<p>This is a sentiment I agree with wholeheartedly but one I find very strange coming from the government who only a year ago <a title="Capital Gains Tax Relief Scrapped" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7035734.stm" target="_self">scrapped</a> Taper Relief, effectively increasing the CGT rate for hard working and enterprising small business owners by 80% from 10% to 18%. Given the number of SME&#8217;s in the PR industry this is particularly pertinent to this sector.</p>
<p>At the same time they reduced the rate on speculative asset transactions e.g. share sales and buy-to-let from a maximum rate of 40% to the same new rate of 18%. The overall benefit to the Treasury? A reported &#8220;massive&#8221; £350m &#8211; small beer these days!</p>
<p>The government subsequently made a small gesture to the SME community by introducing <a title="Entrepreneur Relief" href="http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=180100&amp;d=1025&amp;h=1019&amp;f=1026" target="_self">entrepreneur relief</a> on the first £1m of gains by owner managers &#8211; arguably peanuts in the scheme of things.</p>
<p>So at a time when the country needs, as the PM rightly points out, “hard work, effort and enterprise”, they have created a tax environment that draws no distinction between this and &#8220;irresponsibility and risk taking&#8221; in asset markets. Unless this decision is reversed in the <a title="HM Treasury Pre Budget Report Site" href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/pre_budget_report.htm" target="_self">pre-budget report</a> I find I cannot take these messages seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/37bn-but-the-words-arent-worth-the-paper-they-are-written-on/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A £bn here a £bn there&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/a-bn-here-a-bn-there</link>
		<comments>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/a-bn-here-a-bn-there#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdamParker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordon brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hbos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmenumbers.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to various sources the nitty gritty of the Government&#8217;s bank recapitalisation plan is going to be announced tomorrow morning. The coverage reminds me of a quote from The West Wing &#8220;A billion here a billion there. Sooner or later it starts to add up to real money.&#8221; The important point is what will our £39bn/£50bn get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a title="FT UK set to inject £37bn" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/153e175e-9883-11dd-ace3-000077b07658.html" target="_self">various</a> <a title="UK banks forced to seek £50bn" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7665823.stm" target="_self">sources</a> the nitty gritty of the Government&#8217;s bank recapitalisation plan is going to be announced tomorrow morning. The coverage reminds me of a <a title="West Wing quote" href="http://www.westwingtranscripts.com/search.php?flag=getTranscript&amp;id=6&amp;keyword=sooner%20or%20later#thequery" target="_self">quote</a> from The West Wing &#8220;A billion here a billion there. Sooner or later it starts to add up to real money.&#8221; The important point is what will our £39bn/£50bn get us? By my back of an envelope calculations, based on Friday&#8217;s closing share prices and the current rumours, taxpayers are indeed (as per ft.com) about to become the controlling shareholders in HBOS and RBS.</p>
<p><em>Royal Bank of Scotland</em></p>
<p>Market capitalisation on Friday £11.9bn.<br />
Rumoured ordinary share investment (according to ft.com) £15bn<br />
Post investment shareholding = 15/(15+11.9) = 56%</p>
<p><em>HBOS</em></p>
<p>Market capitalisation on Friday £6.5bn.<br />
Rumoured ordinary share investment (according to ft.com) £9bn<br />
Post investment shareholding = 9/(9+6.5) = 58%</p>
<p>Of course the HBOS situation will then be further confused by the rumoured £5bn investment in Lloyds TSB and the (apparently) still planned merger of the two.</p>
<p>Finally there is the issue of whether given the current investment environment we should even be investing on the basis of Friday&#8217;s closing price anyway? Shrewd investors know how to take <a title="Warren Buffet Goldman Sachs investment" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article4821506.ece" target="_self">advantage</a> of weakness. It will be interesting to see what deal Gordon Brown will have negotiated for us as his <a title="Sale of gold reserves potential cost of £3bn" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2008/06_june/13/gold.shtml" target="_self">track record</a> isn&#8217;t the best or perhaps he is already in <a title="Brown in bed by 10pm" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/oct/09/economy.alistairdarling1" target="_self">bed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showmenumbers.com/economy/a-bn-here-a-bn-there/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
