Simply Health (Apparently) Can’t Be Bothered No Matter What They Claim

Simply Health I needed to contact Simply Health today having picked up a referral letter by hand from my GP because the first one I provided they wouldn’t accept (basically they require me to see a consultant before I can get the MRI scan both my physio and GP think I need which I suspect is an attempt to try and keep costs down). The fax number they gave me and the one on their website were both out of operation. So I rang them to be met by a recorded message.  The message informed me that

due to adverse weather conditions we have decided that employee safety is paramount and we want our employees to get home safely so our offices are now closed.”

Whilst this is admirable and I *applaud* their concern for employee safety the fact that they hadn’t thought to put in place alternative arrangements to handle inbound communications amazes me in 2010. And this from an organisation whose strapline is “We CAN be bothered”. Well Simply Health apparently you can’t be bothered to make any arrangements to deal with members, some of whom could have urgent health matters. Couldn’t you have diverted your numbers to a mobile number? Couldn’t someone have rung in and got messages off voicemail and returned calls? Couldn’t you have manned an email address and then returned calls? Couldn’t a senior member of staff with appropriate transport have manned the phones? Ironic really when a recent press release stated:

During difficult times such as these, companies need to be working harder than ever to attract and retain customers and it is disappointing that customers are finding this is not the case.”

“At Simplyhealth, we pride ourselves on always putting our customers first and doing the right thing, not the easy thing, which we believe is the way in which all customer facing companies should operate.”

I realise that the current weather conditions are adverse – I am in Newcastle which is pretty badily hit – but in this day and age of technology there is no excuse for not maintaining communications. If you are going to make a big thing out of your attitude being different you need to demonstrate it.

Update – I was contacted by Twitter shortly before finalising this post which was a good response and as I have said I don’t disagree with the sentiment about employee safety merely the lack of effort that would appear to have been made to “do the right thing not the easy thing”.

Update 6pm, 8/1/10 - Have received a call from the Corporate Sales and Marketing Director at Simply Health who was  in agreement that with hindsight more could have been done to maintain service levels. The “can be bothered” sentiment was expressed strongly with promises of actions to be taken and I will be updating this post as and when these occur. I hope to be able to report my trust being restored in the brand over the next few days.

Update 9.30am 9/1/10 – Received a call from their customer services manager who had been alerted to my issue by their PR Manager. He apologised for the frustration caused, accepted the constructive nature of the criticism and promised action to resolve my issues first thing on Monday morning. Mark sounded very concerned to ensure that his customers were looked after. The response so far has been excellent, it would be interesting to know though what other customer experiences have been like.

Update 3pm 12/1/10 – This should be my final entry. Have now been contacted by customer services they have processed my referral and an appointment is about to be made. An excellent service in the end. Would be good to know if Simply Health are going to put in place different procedures in the event of any similar situations, but I have definitely experienced evidence that they can indeed be bothered.

Case closed.

, , General

7 thoughts on “Simply Health (Apparently) Can’t Be Bothered No Matter What They Claim

  1. Gah, that was supposed to be a hyperlink. And why is there always a god-dang typo when you’re trying to blow your own trumpet…?

  2. I can see that you have been upset about it. Yeah, I too will be upset if I were in your situation. But at least, in the end, they were able to get back to you and resolved it. After all, they CAN be bothered. :)

  3. In regards to the comments made above it is fair to say “Couldn’t you have diverted your numbers to a mobile number?”- what good would that of done given the circumstances? I mean the building may of been closed due to the weather conditions so how would they have access to your policy? and if they could of authorised the claim the travelling conditions was terrible and you may not of made the appointment anyway. I too had similar issues contacting Simply health in regards to a claim, but i understand that the weather conditions was very bad and precautions had to be made. if there was an urgent health matter i’m sure given the circumstances it would have been ok to have the treatment without it being authorised, But the one thing i definitely agree on is the awful tagline ” We CAN be bothered” – Horrible.

  4. @J Thanks for the comment I take your point about access to systems but I would suspect that a company of the size of Simply Health would have the facility to access their systems remotely across VPN or the like – though clearly I don’t know this. As regards having treatment without it being authorised I am not sure I would want to take that action and risk the consequences were it not to be the case.

    My general point though was more that they could have made more of an effort and this was at odds to their tagline claim. However as I have stated in the updates their subsequent response did give me greater confidence, though I obviously can’t be sure if this was due to the public nature of my criticism or not.

  5. It’s amazing how companies cannot cope in adverse weather conditions, not even having a contingency plan to cover when any situations are outside of the norm. BUT, everyone expects the good old NHS to be their for them no matter what the conditions, time or day and guess what – they always are!!!

  6. I found this as a result of being unable to access the company’s website at about 3 p.m. on a bright and sunny Tuesday. I was thinking about joining. Hmm?

Comments are closed.